Feeling Over Knowing

Recently, my wife and I visited a church in the Nashville area.  Everyone was very nice, welcoming and sincere – I say that because I have a complaint to make, and certainly don’t mean to malign anyone there.  During the worship service, we were singing a song that I had never heard.  It was building up to the climax of a passionate chorus and the first line of that chorus read “All I need is to feel Your love”.

In that moment I had inadvertently stumbled upon a portion of the complaint I have with evangelical Christianity.  I have become more and more convinced that the ‘currents’ of evangelical Christianity are hostile (mostly unintentionally/unknowingly, sometimes intentionally) to intellectual discussion, and obsessed with feeling and experience over any other aspect of ‘understanding’.  That statement may sound harsh, and to my evangelical peers, I can only say that I’m sorry if it does, please hear me out.

I understand the evangelical case against many mainline denominations.  I grew up Presbyterian, and as I began to read the Bible for myself, I questioned why certain topics and passages were ignored.  As a 15-year-old, I saw no real passion or vibrancy in the faith of those around me.  Instead, I saw a group of people adhering to a particular Protestant tradition – and many were not recognizable as Christians when I saw them during the week.  Something inside me knew instinctively that if a Creator existed, then He wasn’t limited to the ‘safe’ and ‘docile’ presentation of Him that I witnessed at that particular church.  In my teens I was introduced to evangelical churches, and discovered Christians who were passionate about their faith, and who wanted to impact those around them.  I was fascinated with Scripture, and being around others so passionate about their faith was a breath of fresh air.  It wasn’t until years later that I began to discern some issues.

Around 13 years ago, a conversation with a co-worker revealed to me just how ill-equipped I was to discuss hard issues – life, death, suffering, justice, purpose – with those who didn’t hold the same faith.  I began to see that there wasn’t really much of an effort in many of the evangelical churches I’d attended to understand the world around them.  No one seemed to be asking “how did we get to where we are?”, and “How do we answer the questions posed by a postmodern world?”  Oh, don’t get me wrong, those churches were asking “How can we make Christianity appeal to those who don’t believe?”  Some call it “seeker-sensitive” – but that’s just one of many frustrating examples of a language ghetto that is encouraged.  Absolutely no effort was being made to understand the mix of philosophies that had led Western culture to where it now sits.  As a result, many evangelical churches have accepted premises that find their roots in worldviews hostile to Christian thought.  We’re encouraged to share our faith, but without any foundation in apologetics.  And when we encounter someone who questions back, we’re given a trite response of encouragement, as if the sole failure is on the part of the ‘hearer’.

My Presbyterian heritage was fairly rich when it came to thought and teaching, though it was sorely lacking in many other respects.  But my complaint with evangelicalism is that anything smacking of tradition is dismissed as legalism and intellectual debate is dismissed as “the pride of man”.  There is such an emphasis on feeling and experience – both of which are an integral part of a much larger whole – but I fear it’s an over-emphasis.  Evangelical leaders lament the ‘consumer’ nature of many congregants, but their whole system lends itself to “what can I experience?” – since that’s all that appears to matter.  So, no, I’m sorry, I need much more than to just “feel” His love.  I need to understand how what Christianity teaches is relevant to my life – from the big, epic questions down to how I love my wife and sons, how I perform at my job, and how I take care of my property.  I need to stop chasing experience from weekly pep-rally service to service.  That kind of ‘consumerism’ only breeds an inability to understand or esteem anything other than the pursuit of the next ‘fix’.  That mindset, in my opinion, has dumbed-down religious discussion among evangelical Christians, it has robbed them of a critical tool in applying Christian teaching to daily life, and it has driven others away from Christianity as a whole.

More on this in the future….

This entry was posted on Sunday, April 25th, 2010 at 11:14 PM and is filed under christianity. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

7 Responses to “Feeling Over Knowing”

  1. Tweets that mention Incremental Thought » Blog Archive » Feeling Over Knowing -- Topsy.com Says:

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jim Cowart. Jim Cowart said: New blog post: Feeling Over Knowing http://is.gd/bHVYE [...]

  2. SteveB Says:

    Jim — what a great post. I think you articulated two great points that have needled me about the evangelical movement and some aspects of modern American Christianity.

    The first is the lack of intellectual scrutiny by evangelicals and the unwillingness to discourse. I remember trying to start a conversation once and I remarked that I had been raised Catholic and the woman turned to me and said, "Oh, well if you don't change, then you're going to Hell." Nice. Needless to say that conversation didn't go very far. Naturally, I have bristled at the willful ignorance of many in the evangelical community regarding matters of science. I guess that being taught by Jesuits to question question question that "wanting to know" and Faith were not mutually exclusive.

    The other was the phrase "people adhering to a particular tradition" — what a great way to put it. These aren't actively religious people and probably haven't wondered why they believe what they espouse any further than "that's what my parents did". It's not wrong, per se — but it's certainly not a philosophy.

  3. Cori Says:

    Awesome post, Jim. I struggle with a lot of the same things. Actually, that whole Vox post I wrote had some roots in this. I recognize now that the men I've dated have all been passive Christians, content to believe what they've been told and not take it beyond Sunday morning. And I want to talk and research and learn and dismiss and add on to my faith, but no one seems to want to go there with me.

    You and me and Steve can have some great discussions — how about that? :)

  4. ashbylane Says:

    Steve – There's a great quote (used as a motto in the EPC church, and elsewhere): In the essentials, unity; in the non-essentials, liberty, and in all things, charity. The impact of that statement on me and how I relate to the Church (all denoms/branches) was profound. It amazes me that someone could be so arrogant as to simply assume Catholics are going to Hell! I sat through a DVD series a couple of years ago called "Truth Project" (created by Focus on the Family) at the same time I was reading "Total Truth" and "How, Now Shall We Live" and what stuck out to me is the fact that Catholics had some of the *best* approaches in helping people and communities. Evangelical churches could stand to learn a LOT from Catholic ministry (sure, they both have their faults). The habit of questioning and examining is vital to a real and active faith! It's a shame that some churches view questions as threats. Is God really scared of our questions? I seriously doubt that! I found the order of your statement interesting: "the lack of intellectual scrutiny…and the unwillingness to discourse". I think one leads naturally to the other. While no one has specifically admitted this to me, I have an impression that many evangelicals refuse to discourse because they have no idea what to say beyond personal conviction. After all – what good is strong personal conviction in a post-modern, relativistic world? If you're not better equipped to think and discuss beyond that, you'll always be dismissed with a simple "Well, that's ok for YOU…."

  5. ashbylane Says:

    Steve – There's a great quote (used as a motto in the EPC church, and elsewhere): In the essentials, unity; in the non-essentials, liberty, and in all things, charity. The impact of that statement on me and how I relate to the Church (all denoms/branches) was profound. It amazes me that someone could be so arrogant as to simply assume Catholics are going to Hell! I sat through a DVD series a couple of years ago called "Truth Project" (created by Focus on the Family) at the same time I was reading "Total Truth" and "How, Now Shall We Live" and what stuck out to me is the fact that Catholics had some of the *best* approaches in helping people and communities. Evangelical churches could stand to learn a LOT from Catholic ministry (sure, they both have their faults). The habit of questioning and examining is vital to a real and active faith! It's a shame that some churches view questions as threats. Is God really scared of our questions? I seriously doubt that! I found the order of your statement interesting: "the lack of intellectual scrutiny…and the unwillingness to discourse". I think one leads naturally to the other. While no one has specifically admitted this to me, I have an impression that many evangelicals refuse to discourse because they have no idea what to say beyond personal conviction. After all – what good is strong personal conviction in a post-modern, relativistic world? If you're not better equipped to think and discuss beyond that, you'll always be dismissed with a simple "Well, that's ok for YOU…."

  6. ashbylane Says:

    If you, Steve and I lived in the same city, I think we'd have an awesome coffee-shop conversation tradition! It's difficult to find people who are comfortable 'going there' into asking tough questions and realizing that real answers won't necessarily be neat-and-tidy-from-the-pulpit-complete-with-alliteration-and-humor quotes. I can understand the reaction many evangelicals have to that sort of questioning (though I don't agree with it at all). It's a dangerous road. Many people have gone down it and lost their faith entirely; others have dared to go there, emerged as giants and we get to reap the rewards across decades and centuries (CS Lewis, Augustine, Dallas Willard and others come to mind). On the whole, there are things I still love and cherish about my split Presbyterian/Evangelical heritage. However, I'm *done* with churches that have no interest in helping Christians love God with all their heart, *mind*, soul and strength. If they focus on experience to the exclusion of equally important aspects of faith, I can almost guarantee there will be an attitude of anti-intellectualism and sensationalism – both of which are a death knell when it comes to producing lasting & substantial change in others' lives.

    Keep questioning, researching and learning. I'm confident you will find a guy who understands and feels the same way, because what you value (and what you learn) will play a huge part in leading you to that kind of person (and weeding the others out).

  7. Incremental Thought » Blog Archive » From Community to Cult Says:

    [...] but have attended mostly evangelical/charismatic ‘style’ churches for the last 20 years (see my earlier post).  Twenty years is more than enough time for some common problems to have been [...]

Leave a Reply